News: Brokerage

Law: Sometimes a guaranty is no guarantee at all - by Richard Blumberg and Brenna Strype

Richard Blumberg

 

Brenna Strype

 

In direct response to the COVID-19 pandemic, New York City’s City Council passed a local ordinance on May 26, 2020 in an attempt to protect tenants of commercial rental agreements. Many commercial leases in New York City contain “personal guaranty” clauses which permit landlords to collect unpaid rent, utilities or taxes directly from the business owners, who contract and agree to be responsible for the unpaid rent of the business in the event of a default. In fact, those personal guaranty clauses are the only reason many landlords agree to rent out their buildings to businesses.

However, Guaranty Law No.55-2020 gave a reprieve to commercial business owners who signed personal guaranties in their contracts, as long as they meet certain conditions, which include being forced to shut down or substantially limit their businesses as a result of governor Cuomo’s executive orders (which were passed in direct response to the pandemic in March of 2020). It appears this law does not contain any avenue for landlords to ever recoup unpaid rent due between March 2020 through March 2021, in direct contravention to the lease agreements that were signed.

Although we believe that there may be multiple constitutional challenges to this local ordinance, one such case was recently decided by the Southern District of New York. In that case, Judge Ronnie Abrams determined that said ordinance was constitutional as it did not violate the contract clause, finding that although the landlord plaintiff “plausibly alleged substantial impairment to his contract…this circuit affords “substantial deference” to those policymakers making good-faith efforts to act in the public interest.” (Melendez v. The City of New York, no. 20-CV-5301 [S.D.N.Y. November 25, 2020]). As such, the court found that this legislation advanced a legitimate public interest and did so in a reasonable and necessary manner.

Richard Blumberg is a partner and Brenna Strype is an attorney at Forchelli Deegan Terrana LLP in Uniondale, N.Y.

READ ON THE GO
DIGITAL EDITIONS
Subscribe
Columns and Thought Leadership
AI comes to public relations, but be cautious, experts say - by Harry Zlokower

AI comes to public relations, but be cautious, experts say - by Harry Zlokower

Last month Bisnow scheduled the New York AI & Technology cocktail event on commercial real estate, moderated by Tal Kerret, president, Silverstein Properties, and including tech officers from Rudin Management, Silverstein Properties, structural engineering company Thornton Tomasetti and the founder of Overlay Capital Build,
Behind the post: Why reels, stories, and shorts work for CRE (and how to use them) - by Kimberly Zar Bloorian

Behind the post: Why reels, stories, and shorts work for CRE (and how to use them) - by Kimberly Zar Bloorian

Let’s be real: if you’re still only posting photos of properties, you’re missing out. Reels, Stories, and Shorts are where attention lives, and in commercial real estate, attention is currency.
Strategic pause - by Shallini Mehra and Chirag Doshi

Strategic pause - by Shallini Mehra and Chirag Doshi

Many investors are in a period of strategic pause as New York City’s mayoral race approaches. A major inflection point came with the Democratic primary victory of Zohran Mamdani, a staunch tenant advocate, with a progressive housing platform which supports rent freezes for rent
Lasting effects of eminent domain on commercial development - by Sebastian Jablonski

Lasting effects of eminent domain on commercial development - by Sebastian Jablonski

The state has the authority to seize all or part of privately owned commercial real estate for public use by the power of eminent domain. Although the state is constitutionally required to provide just compensation to the property owner, it frequently fails to account