Recently, two companies separately agreed to pay civil penalties totaling a combined $77,000 to resolve accusations that they violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act in connection with their hiring processes. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) brought separate lawsuits in federal court against Quality Terminal Services, LLC and Rail Terminal Services, LLC. In both lawsuits, the FTC alleged that the companies contracted with a credit agency to conduct background checks on employees and applicants, including criminal record reviews, and then made hiring and firing decisions based on those background checks. The FTC also alleged that each company failed to provide the employees with the notices required by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.
These cases are an important reminder that the act applies to most employers that conduct background checks on employees and applicants and highlight the need for them to understand and follow the requirements of the act. The act is implicated when an employer hires a third party to conduct background checks and seek employees' and job applicants' credit records, criminal histories and other background information.
The act requires an employer to provide the applicant or employee with notice before it takes adverse action, which includes dismissal or rejection of an employment application, based on a consumer report. The employer must also provide the employee with a copy of the report, identify the agency that provided the report to the employer, and inform the affected individual of his or her right to obtain a free copy of the report to dispute its accuracy.
The cases against Quality Terminal and Rail Terminal illustrate that the FTC can bring an action on behalf of employees, but employees also have the ability to bring their own action for violations of the act. The result could be equally damaging, as a successful employee in such an action can recover attorneys' fees and three times their actual damages.
Any employer that is using a third party to conduct background checks on employees or applicants should ensure that it is familiar with, and following, the requirements of the act.
Daniel Morris is a counsel at Clifton Budd & DeMaria LLP, New York, N.Y.
Manhattan, NY According to Meridian Capital Group, Jordan Langer, Noam Aziz and Carson Shahrabani of the firm’s retail leasing team have arranged a five-year lease at 236 West 10th St. in Greenwich Village
Last month Bisnow scheduled the New York AI & Technology cocktail event on commercial real estate, moderated by Tal Kerret, president, Silverstein Properties, and including tech officers from Rudin Management, Silverstein Properties, structural engineering company Thornton Tomasetti and the founder of Overlay Capital Build,
The state has the authority to seize all or part of privately owned commercial real estate for public use by the power of eminent domain. Although the state is constitutionally required to provide just compensation to the property owner, it frequently fails to account
Many investors are in a period of strategic pause as New York City’s mayoral race approaches. A major inflection point came with the Democratic primary victory of Zohran Mamdani, a staunch tenant advocate, with a progressive housing platform which supports rent freezes for rent
Let’s be real: if you’re still only posting photos of properties, you’re missing out. Reels, Stories, and Shorts are where attention lives, and in commercial real estate, attention is currency.