News: Spotlight Content

Customer service vs. profitability: To what degree should each be sacrificed?

Engineering MEP Consulting firms (as do other businesses) have the precarious task of juggling profitability with customer service, and to what degree should each be sacrificed. Growing from an independent sole proprietor, into a professional corporation, required a very unique balance between the level of services to provide, maintaining project schedules, and of course, how to maintain profitability. Being a lone star and having to constantly focus on these three items, much attention is required to allocating the appropriate amount of time to each of these tasks and still maintaining an efficient company. Efficiency in this case should be measured as the success rate of being able to satisfy the most basic and also the most difficult client needs, while maintaining profitability. As we know in the construction and engineering industry, time is of the essence, and in addition, most clients who retain our services are looking for a little pampering and hand holding. But how do we attend to our client's needs, while maintaining delivery of their product on time? This becomes an issue many business owners have been facing over the past years, but is critical to the success of a company. Customer service is what clients want, and it is not an option to forgo it. As good an engineer one can be (or other), adding the spice of "customer service" to a project, allows for a more pleased client. This is essential for long term client stability and repeat type business. With the dynamics of the current markets, customer service, combined with quality, is going to be the recipe for success. During the past few years, clients were looking for speed and volume, over accuracy and service. Engineering companies, exasperated with volumes of work, could not afford the client hand holding and babysitting required for marketing the next project with that same client. Companies could also afford to maintain maximum fees and profitability while minimizing project design schedules in this volume frenzied environment. However, in today's markets, business owners need to rethink profitability and to provide a close, client service. Client service can, and usually does, come at some cost to the project. Additional time for phone calls, meetings, designs, marketing, etc. can quickly start to deplete the initial fees. In this dynamic environment, the "pro-bono" work in order to obtain a certain level of service is essential. This is not such a bad thing if this additional service turns into another project with the same client! It becomes the old give and take scenario, but needs to be executed within reason. As much as all companies need to divert more of their attention to customer services, smaller business in this tight market can have a dramatic advantage over larger companies. Larger companies are in the midst of downsizing to stabilize their companies, which can substantially divert from client customer services. Small engineering companies specifically can take advantage of this market to provide a higher level of customer service that clients have not recently been familiar with. Successful small business will typically have direct principal involvement throughout the course of the project. This same principal is typically involved directly with the design, client meetings, bidding, construction and closeout, which provides a strong quality of service for the client and inherent customer services. Clients feel they have gained a better value for their fee payments since they have been catered to by the principal of the company for the entire project. And yes, in a lot of cases, the time spent and costs on the project will increase, but the client is always right, especially in a challenging economy. Ideally, this will also lead to the next project. Client focus and service is a major requirement for many companies during these challenging times and will come at some cost to the profitability of a project or company, but it is absolutely essential in order to maintain a level of stability and possibly even some growth in a tight economy. Joseph Lecce, P.E., P.C. is the president of Lecce Engineering, Mt. Kisco, N.Y.
MORE FROM Spotlight Content

Over half of Long Island towns vote to exceed the tax cap - Here’s how owners can respond - by Brad and Sean Cronin

When New York permanently adopted the 2% property tax cap more than a decade ago, many owners hoped it would finally end the relentless climb in tax bills. But in the last couple of years, that “cap” has started to look more like a speed bump. Property owners are seeing taxes increase even when an
READ ON THE GO
DIGITAL EDITIONS
Subscribe
Columns and Thought Leadership
How much power does the NYC mayor really have over real estate policy? - by Ron Cohen

How much power does the NYC mayor really have over real estate policy? - by Ron Cohen

The mayor of New York City holds significant influence over real estate policy — but not absolute legislative power. Here’s how it breaks down:

Formal Legislative Role

Limited direct lawmaking power: The NYC Council is the primary
Oldies but goodies:  The value of long-term ownership in rent-stabilized assets - by Shallini Mehra

Oldies but goodies: The value of long-term ownership in rent-stabilized assets - by Shallini Mehra

Active investors seeking rent-stabilized properties often gravitate toward buildings that have been held under long-term ownership — and for good reasons. These properties tend to be well-maintained, both physically and operationally, offering a level of stability
The strategy of co-op busting in commercial real estate - by Robert Khodadadian

The strategy of co-op busting in commercial real estate - by Robert Khodadadian

In New York City’s competitive real estate market, particularly in prime neighborhoods like Midtown Manhattan, investors are constantly seeking new ways to unlock property value. One such strategy — often overlooked but
Properly serving a lien law Section 59 Demand - by Bret McCabe

Properly serving a lien law Section 59 Demand - by Bret McCabe

Many attorneys operating within the construction space are familiar with the provisions of New York Lien Law, which allow for the discharge of a Mechanic’s Lien in the event the lienor does not commence an action to enforce following the service of a “Section 59 Demand”.